Tools
AI & LLM Cost Calculator
Work out what an AI workflow actually costs to run — per task and per month — using published API rates rather than per-token abstractions.
Step 1: What is the AI doing?
Each workload carries a typical token profile. Adjust your own numbers against these.
Step 2: Which model?
List prices per million tokens, read from each vendor's pricing page in August 2026.
Step 3: Volume and optimisations
13.5x the cost of GPT-4o mini on the same workload — a difference of $73.62 a month. Whether that is worth paying depends on accuracy on your data, not on the token bill.
Same workload, every model
| Model | Per task | Per month | Per year |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o mini | 0.06 cents | $5.88 | $70.56 |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0.40 cents | $39.75 | $477.02 |
| Claude Sonnet 5selected | 0.80 cents | $79.50 | $954.05 |
| GPT-4o | 0.98 cents | $98.00 | $1,176 |
| Claude Opus 5 | 1.99 cents | $198.76 | $2,385 |
How this is calculated
Cost per task is input tokens multiplied by the input rate, plus output tokens multiplied by the output rate. Prompt caching reprices the repeating share of input at 0.1x. Batch processing halves both sides. Nothing else is assumed.
Rates are vendor list prices read in August 2026. Token counts per workload are typical profiles, not measurements of your system — count the tokens on one real run of your own task and substitute them for a figure you can defend.
Deliberately excluded: retries, failed extractions needing a second pass, human review time, and the engineering cost of building the pipeline. In most deployments the human review line is larger than the inference line, which is why accuracy is worth measuring before cost.
Want this modelled against your real workload?
We build production AI systems and size the cost before the build starts, using your documents, your volumes and measured accuracy rather than list-price arithmetic.
